Should India send its troops to Iraq if there were to be a UN mandate on peace keeping in Iraq. Not exactly a simple question because it would have, hidden behind it numerous uncomfortable questions and snide comments. Things like ...
How neutral would be UN be anyway ? Wouldn't the US be bullying / arm-twisting the UN's mandate into something that suits it ?
In such a case, isnt a UN mandate more of a charade ? an act of legalising an act against humanity ?
even if there were to be a UN mandate under which Indian troops serve in Iraq, what is to prevent the Iraqis from viewing these force as part of an Occupation force and there cause harm to them ?
Who's war are we gonna be fighting anyway ?
I was truly proud of our Government's decision NOT to send in troops into Iraq under an American command. This was, one bold act of courageous diplomacy engaged in by the Indian government. One really feared a repeat of the spineless response to 9/11 in offering all our services and more in the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan.
I would say that India stay away from Iraq till the day when the US finally confides to its massive screw up in Iraq !!!
3 months of Occupation and yet basic facilities are not restored ! Unannounced searches and excesses by the occupying forces !
To George W Bush & his cohort Tony Blair, I have one thing to say ...
"Why ?"
Recent Comments